Модель экономических журналов

Хотелось бы отметить, что название журнала порой само говорит о степени его значимости, априори уже можно сказать, что журналы, имеющие сугубо узкую направленность, не являются значимыми (например, «European Journal of Health Economics», «International Journal of Health Care Finance & Economics», «Pharmacoeconomics», «Work Employment and Society», «Mathematical Finance»).

Заключение

В работе осуществлен обзор литературы, касающейся основных методов анализа кросс-цитирования, индексов цитирования, классических мер центральности, выявлены их плюсы и минусы, определены границы использования каждого индекса для оценки значимости основных экономических журналов.

В качестве исходных данных было взято 100 экономических журналов, по которым были собраны данные о числе цитирований статей 2011-2014 гг. за 2014 год. Для анализа сети цитирований были рассчитаны индексы центральности: классические и новый (SRIC).

В результате проведенного исследования выявлены очевидные, системно-значимые журналы типа AER, «Journal of Banking & Finance». В то же время следует отметить, что есть и не совсем очевидные лидеры. Благодаря использованию SRIC мы выделили журналы, имеющие относительно небольшое число цитирований на большое число других журналов, а также такие журналы, которые имеют большое число цитирований статей своего же журнала и одновременно мало цитирований других журналов на данный журнал.

Результаты проведенного анализа свидетельствуют о том, что имеется оптимальный инструмент метода анализа кросс-цитирования, который применим и как руководство при выборе журнала для публикации исследователями своих статей, и как альтернативный критерий оценки значимости научного издания. Использование SRIC позволяет определить, как смещаются акценты в распределении рангов журналов. Предложенный подход может быть применен к различным категориям научных журналов для идентификации системно-значимых изданий.

Список литературы

1. Алескеров Ф.Т., Писляков В.В., Субочев А.Н. и др. Построение рейтингов журналов по менеджменту с помощью методов теории коллективного выбора: Препринт WP7/2011/04. М.: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики, 2011. 44 с.

2. Алескеров Ф.Т., Писляков В.В., Субочев А.Н. Построение рейтингов журналов по экономике с помощью методов теории коллективного выбора: Препринт WP7/2013/03. М.: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики, 2013. 48 с.

3. Бредихин С.В., Кузнецов А.Ю., Щербакова Н.Г. Анализ цитирования в библиометрии. Новосибирск: ИВМиМГ СО РАН, НЭИКОН, 2013. 344 с.

4. Писляков В.В. Методы оценки научного знания по показателям цитирования // Социологический журнал. 2007, № 1. С. 128-140.

5. Писляков В.В. Библиометрические индикаторы в ресурсах Thomson Reuters // Руководство по наукометрии: индикаторы развития науки и технологии / М.А. Акоев, В.А. Маркусова, О.В. Москалева, В.В. Писляков Екатеринбург: Изд-во Урал. ун-та, 2014. 250 с.

6. Рубинштейн А.Я. Ранжирование российских экономических журналов: научный метод или «игра в цифирь»? [Электронный ресурс] / URL:http:// inecon.org/docs/Rubinstein_paper_20160405. pdf (дата обращения: 22.04.2016)

7. Цыганов А.В. Краткое описание наукометрических показателей, основанных на цитируемости // Управление большими системами. 2013. № 44. С. 248-261.

8. Aleskerov F.T. Power indices taking into account agents' preferences In: B. Simeone & F. Pukelsheim (eds), Mathematics and Democracy, Berlin: Springer, 2006, pp. 1-18.

9. Aleskerov F.T., Andrievskaya I.K., & Permjakova Е.Е. Key borrowers detected by the intensities of their short-range interactions / Working papers by NRU Higher School of Economics. Series FE "Financial Economics". 2014. No. WP BRP 33/FE/2014. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2479272

10. Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F.J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields. Journal of Informetrics, 2009. 3(4), 273-289.

11. Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. Citations versus journal impact factor as proxy of quality: Could the latter ever be preferable? Scientometrics, 2010, 84(3), 821-833.

12. Barrat, A., Barthelemy, M., Pastor-Satorras, R., & Vespignani, A. The architecture of complex weighted networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2004. Vol. 101, Iss. 11, pp. 3747-3752.

13. Beira, E. Eugene Garfield, from ISI to Thomson Reuters: A timeline. Mercados e Empresas: Dinamicas e estrategias, 2010. 104, 1-17.

14. Bensman, S.J. Garfield and the impact factor. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 2007. 41(1), 93-155.

15. Bergstrom, C. Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals. College & Research Libraries News, 2007. 68(5): 314-316.

16. Bolland, J.M. Sorting out centrality: an analysis of the performance of four centrality models in real and simulated networks. Social Networks, 1988. 10 (3), 233-253.

17. Bollen, J., Rodriguez M. A., Van de Sompel H. Journal status. Scientometrics. 2006. 69: 669-687.

18. Bollen, J., Van de Sompel, H. Usage impact factor: the effects of sample characteristics on usage-based impact metrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology, 2008. 59: 001-014.

19. Bollen, J., Van de Sompel, H., Hagberg, A., & Chute, R. A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures. PLoS ONE, 2009. 4(6): e6022. URL http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3 Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal. pone.0006022

20. Bonacich, P. Technique for Analyzing Overlapping Memberships // Sociological Methodology, Vol. 4, 1972, pp.176-185.

21. Bonacich, P., Lloyd, P. Eigenvector-like measures of centrality for asymmetric relations, Social Networks, 2001. Vol. 23, Iss. 3, pp. 191-201.

22. Bordons, M., Fernandez, M.T., & Gomez, I. Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance. Scientometrics. 2002. 53: 195-206.

23. Borgatti, S. P. Identifying sets of key players in a network // Computational, Mathematical and Organizational Theory. 2006. Vol. 12. № 1. Р. 21-34.

24. Borgatti, S. P., Foster, P. The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology // Journal of Management. 2003. Vol. 29. № 6. Р. 991-1013.

25. Braun T., Glanzel W., & Schubert A. A hirsch-type index for journals. Scientometrics, 2006. Vol. 69. No. 1. P. 169-173.

26. Brin, S., Page, L. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. Computer Networks and ICDN Systems, 1998, 30:107-117.

27. Brodman, E. Methods of choosing physiology journals. Bull Med Libr Assn, 1944, 32:479-483.

28. Colledge, L., De Moya-Anegon F., Guerrero-Bote, V., Lopez-Illescas, C., El Aisati, M., & Moed, H.F. SJR and SNIP: two new journal metrics in Elsevier's Scopus. UKSG Serials, 2010. 23, 215-221.

29. Cronin, B. The need for a theory of citing // J. Documentation, 1981. V. 37, iss. 1. P. 16-24.

30. Cronin, B. The citation process: The role and significance of citations in scientific communication. London: Taylor Graham. 1984. 103 p.

31. Egghe, L. Mathematical relations between impact factors and average number of citations. Information Processing and Management. 1998. 24: 567-576.

32. Egghe, L. How to improve the h-index. The Scientist, 2006a. 20(3), p. 14.

33. Egghe, L. An improvement of the H-index: the G-index. ISSI Newsletter, 2006b. 2(1), 8-9.

34. Egghe , L. Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics. 2006с. 69: 131-152.

35. Falagas M., Kouranos V. D., Arencibia-Jorge R., & Karageorgopoulos D. E. Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor. FASEB J. 2008. 22, 2623-2628.

36. Faust, K., & Wasserman, S. Centrality and prestige: A review and synthesis. Journal of Quantitative Anthropology, 1992. 4, 23-78.

37. Fersht, A. The most influential journals: Impact Factor and Eigenfactor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009. 106(17), 6883-6884.

38. Frank, M. Impact factors: arbiter of excellence? JMLA, 2003. 91, 4-6.

39. Freeman, L.C. A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 1977. 40: 35-41.

40. Freeman, L. C. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification // Social Networks. 1979. Т. 1. № 3. Р. 215-239.

41. Friedkin, N. E. Theoretical foundations for centrality measures. American Journal of Sociology, 1991. 96:1478-504

42. Garfield E. Citation indexes for science: a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science. 1955;122(3159): 108-11.

43. Garfield, E. Science Citation Index -- A New Dimension in Indexing. Science, 1964. 144(3619):649-54.

44. Garfield, E. Journal impact factor: a brief review. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 1999. 161: 979-980.

45. Garfield E. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA. 2006; 295(1): 90-3.

46. Garfield, E. A century of citation indexing. Key note address // 12th International Conference on Webometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics and COLLNET meeting. Istanbul, 2011.

47. Garfield, E., & Sher, I. H. New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing. American Documentation, 1963. 14(3), 195-201.

48. Glanzel, W. Towards a model for diachronous and synchronous citation analyses // Scientometrics. 2004. Vol. 60. No. 3. P. 511-522.

49. Glanzel, W. On the h-index - a mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact. Scientometrics, 2006, 67, 315-321.

50. Glanzel, W., Moed, H.F. Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. Scientometrics. 2002, 53 (2). P. 171-193.

51. Gonzalez-Pereira B., Guerrero-Bote V.P., & Moya-Anegon F. A new approach to the metric of journals' scientific prestige: The SJR indicator. Journal of Informetrics. 2010; 4(3): 379-391.

52. Gross, P.L.K., Gross, E.M. College libraries and chemical education. Science, 1927. 66:385-389.

53. Harter S.P, Nisonger T.E. ISI's impact factor as misnomer: a proposed new measure to assess journal impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 1997. 48: 1146-1148.

54. Kodrzycki, Y. K., Yu, P. D. New approaches to ranking economics journals. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy (Contributions). 2006. Vol. 5.

55. Kurmis, A.P. Understanding the limitations of the journal impact factor. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., 2003. 85: 2449-2449.

56. Leydesdorff, L. Theories of citation? Scientometrics, 1998. 43, 5-25.

57. Leydesdorff, L. Can scientific journals be classified in terms of aggregated journal-journal citation relations using the Journal Citation Reports? Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 2006. 57 (5): 601- 613.

58. Leydesdorff, L. Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007а. 58: 1303-1319.

59. Leydesdorff, L. Visualization of the citation impact environments of scientific journals: An online mappin // Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007b. 58 (1). Pp. 25-38. Available at: at: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1002/asi.20406.

60. Leydesdorff, L. Caveats for the use of citation indicators in research and journal evaluations // Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2008. 59 (2). Pp. 278-287. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ asi.20743.

61. Leydesdorff, L. How are new citation-based journal indicators adding to the bibliometric toolbox? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2009. 60(7), 1327-1336.

62. Leydesdorff, L. Alternatives to the journal impact factor: I3 and the top-10% (or top-25%?) of the most highly cited papers. Scientometrics, 2012. 92, 355-365.

63. Leydesdorff, L., de Moya-Anegon, F., & de Nooy, W. Aggregated journal-journal citation relations in Scopus and Web of Science matched and compared in terms of networks, maps, and interactive overlays. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2016, 67, 6.

64. Liebowitz, S. J., Palmer, J. P. Assessing the relative impacts of economics journals. Journal of Economic Literature, 22: 77-88, 1984.

65. Ma, N., Guan, J., & Zhao, Y. Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis. Information Processing and Management, 2008. 44(2), 800-810.

66. MacRoberts, M. and MacRoberts, B. Problems of citation analysis: a critical review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1989, 40, 342-349.

67. McCain, K.W. Mapping economics through the journal literature: an experiment in journal cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1991, 42, 290-296.

68. Mingers, J., Leydesdorff, L. A review of theory and practice in Scientometrics. European Journal of Operational Research, 2015. 246(1): 1-19.

69. Moed, H. F. Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation. Dordrecht (Netherlands): Springer. 2005, 346 pp.

70. Moed, H. F. New developments in the user of citation analysis in research evaluation. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis (Warszawa), 2009. 17, 13-18.

71. Moed, H. F. The source normalized impact per paper is a valid and sophisticated indicator of journal citation impact (Letter to the Editor). Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011. 62, 211-213.

72. Moed, H. F. and Van Leeuwen, Th. N. Improving the accuracy of institute for scientific information's journal impact factors. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 1995. 46: 461-467

73. Moed, H.F., Van Leeuwen, Th.N., & Reedijk, J. A critical analysis of the journal impact factors of Angewandte Chemie and The Journal of the American Chemical Society: Inaccuracies in published impact factors based on overall citations only. Scientometrics, 1996. 37, 105-116.

74. Moed, H.F., Van Leeuwen, Th.N., & Reedijk, J. Towards appropriate indicators of journal impact, Scientometrics, 1999. 46, 575-589.

75. Newman, M.E.J. Networks: An Introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2010. 784 p.

76. Opthof, T. Sense and nonsense about the impact factor. Cardiovascular Research. 1997. 33: 1-7.

77. Pinski, G., Narin, F. Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific publications: Theory, with application to the literature of physics, Inf. Proc. and Management, 12(1976), pp. 297-312.

78. Price, D. de Solla. Foreword. Essays of an information scientist. Philadelphia, 1980. Vol. 3. P. 5-9.

79. Rousseau, R. Citation distribution of pure mathematics journals // Informetrics 87/88 / L. Egghe, R. Rousseau (eds.). Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1988. P. 249-262.

80. Rousseau, R. Journal evaluation: Technical and practical issues // Library Trends. 2002. Vol. 50. Iss. 3. P. 418-439.

81. Rousseau, R. Median and percentile impact factors: A set of new indicators. Scientometrics. 2005. 63: 431-441.

82. Saad, G. Convergent validity between metrics of journal prestige: the eigenfactor, article influence, and h-index scores. Preprint. 2007.

83. Saha, S., Saint, S., & Christakis, D. A. Impact factor: A valid measure of journal quality? Journal of Medical Library Association, 2003. 91(1), 42-46.

84. Saper, C. B. What's in a citation impact factor? A journal by any other measure J. Comp. Neurol., 1999. 411: 1-2.

85. Seglen, P.O. Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact. JASIS, 1994. 45, 1-11.

86. Seglen, P.O. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal. 1997, pp 314-497.

87. Small, H. Co-citation in scientific literature - new measure of relationship between 2 documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1973. Volume 24, Issue 4, p. 265-269.

88. Stephenson K., Zelen M. Rethinking centrality: Methods and examples. Social Networks, 1989. 11: 1-37.

89. Van Leeuwen, T.N., Moed, H.F. Characteristics of Journal Impact Factors: The effects of uncitedness and citation distribution on the understanding of journal impact factors. Scientometrics, 2005. 63, 357-371.

90. Vanclay , J. K. The impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification? Scientometrics, 2011. Vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 211-238.

91. Von Peter, G. International banking centres: a network perspective, BIS Quarterly Review, December 2007.

92. Yue, W., Wilson, C. S. & Rousseau, R. The Immediacy Index and the Journal Impact Factor: Two Highly Correlated Derived Measures. The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 2004, 28(1), 33-48.

93. Waltman, L. A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 2015. 10(2), 365-391.

94. Waltman, L. & Van Eck, N. A systematic empirical comparison of different approaches for normalizing citation impact indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 2013. 7(4), 833-849.

95. Whitehouse, G.H. Citation rates and impact factors: Should they matter? British Journal of Radiology, 2001. 74(877), 1-3.

Приложения

Приложение 1

Число цитирований журнала А на журнал Б за 2011 год

2011	Quarterly Journal of Economics	Journal of Finance	Journal of Economic Literature	Journal of Economic Perspectives	Journal of Financial Economics	Review of Economic Studies	Econometrica	American Economic Journal-Macroeconomics	American Economic Review	Economic Systems Research
Quarterly Journal of Economics	14	1	0	1	2	3	6	3	15	0
Journal of Finance	3	27	1	2	36	1	1	1	3	0
Journal of Economic Literature	3	5	2	1	1	0	2	1	12	0
Journal of Economic Perspectives	0	2	1	4	1	2	4	0	6	0
Journal of Financial Economics	5	39	1	2	56	3	1	0	9	0
Review of Economic Studies	8	0	0	1	0	6	7	1	14	0
Econometrica	3	1	0	3	0	3	14	1	12	0
American Economic Journal-Macroeconomics	5	1	3	0	0	1	2	2	10	0
American Economic Review	28	4	7	8	7	9	18	6	51	0
Economic Systems Research	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	24

Приложение 2

Число цитирований журнала А на журнал Б за 2012 год

2012	Quarterly Journal of Economics	Journal of Finance	Journal of Economic Literature	Journal of Economic Perspectives	Journal of Financial Economics	Review of Economic Studies	Econometrica	American Economic Journal-Macroeconomics	American Economic Review	Economic Systems Research
Quarterly Journal of Economics	9	2	2	1	2	6	3	0	19	0
Journal of Finance	3	25	1	0	30	0	1	1	6	0
Journal of Economic Literature	0	0	2	2	0	2	1	1	9	0
Journal of Economic Perspectives	2	3	1	3	1	2	2	0	12	0
Journal of Financial Economics	1	40	0	1	53	0	3	0	7	0
Review of Economic Studies	2	0	1	0	0	5	9	2	13	0
Econometrica	3	1	0	0	3	6	18	1	14	0
American Economic Journal-Macroeconomics	3	0	0	1	0	3	2	6	7	0
American Economic Review	13	3	1	6	6	10	20	1	59	0
Economic Systems Research	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	6

Приложение 3

Число цитирований журнала А на журнал Б за 2013 год

2013	Quarterly Journal of Economics	Journal of Finance	Journal of Economic Literature	Journal of Economic Perspectives	Journal of Financial Economics	Review of Economic Studies	Econometrica	American Economic Journal-Macroeconomics	American Economic Review	Economic Systems Research
Quarterly Journal of Economics	13	0	1	3	1	3	8	0	15	0
Journal of Finance	1	21	0	0	19	1	3	0	4	0
Journal of Economic Literature	0	0	8	5	0	0	2	0	2	0
Journal of Economic Perspectives	6	0	1	5	2	1	1	0	11	0
Journal of Financial Economics	2	26	0	0	32	1	2	0	5	0
Review of Economic Studies	0	2	0	0	0	4	2	0	5	0
Econometrica	0	1	1	0	1	5	18	0	15	0
American Economic Journal-Macroeconomics	0	0	1	0	0	2	3	1	5	0
American Economic Review	9	5	5	4	1	7	11	7	40	0
Economic Systems Research	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	47

Приложение 4

Число цитирований журнала А на журнал Б за 2014 год

2014	Quarterly Journal of Economics	Journal of Finance	Journal of Economic Literature	Journal of Economic Perspectives	Journal of Financial Economics	Review of Economic Studies	Econometrica	American Economic Journal-Macroeconomics	American Economic Review	Economic Systems Research
Quarterly Journal of Economics	4	0	0	0	0	0	2	0	6	0
Journal of Finance	0	11	0	0	4	0	0	0	1	0
Journal of Economic Literature	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Journal of Economic Perspectives	2	0	0	1	2	0	1	0	4	0
Journal of Financial Economics	0	6	0	0	6	0	0	0	0	0
Review of Economic Studies	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Econometrica	0	0	0	0	1	1	51	1	2	0
American Economic Journal-Macroeconomics	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	23	1	0
American Economic Review	1	0	1	0	0	1	0	2	119	0
Economic Systems Research	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	16

Приложение 5

Число цитирований журнала А на журнал Б за 2011 - 2014 годы

2011-2014	Quarterly Journal of Economics	Journal of Finance	Journal of Economic Literature	Journal of Economic Perspectives	Journal of Financial Economics	Review of Economic Studies	Econometrica	American Economic Journal-Macroeconomics	American Economic Review	Economic Systems Research
Quarterly Journal of Economics	40	3	3	5	5	12	19	3	55	0
Journal of Finance	7	84	2	2	89	2	5	2	14	0
Journal of Economic Literature	3	5	14	8	1	2	5	2	23	0
Journal of Economic Perspectives	10	5	3	13	6	5	8	0	33	0
Journal of Financial Economics	8	111	1	3	147	4	6	0	21	0
Review of Economic Studies	10	2	1	1	0	15	18	3	32	0
Econometrica	6	3	1	3	5	15	101	3	43	0
American Economic Journal-Macroeconomics	8	1	4	2	0	6	7	32	23	0
American Economic Review	51	12	14	18	14	27	49	16	269	0
Economic Systems Research	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	93

Размещено на Allbest.ur